BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

History repeating itself? (sort of)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 57
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 2406
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
W.B.:

When I was looking at all that third rail ready to be transported to whatever location and installed, it reminded me of how virtually everyone (except transit historians) are under the assumption that "all third rail is alike".

Not only were the third rails not alike, their positioning wasn't, either. To this day, the positioning of third rails on the IRT is different from how they're aligned on the BMT and IND. The Brighton and Broadway-Brooklyn lines for years had the third rails so high that they didn't even have the protective covers above them, and wouldn't until they were replaced in the early 1960's with the BMT-IND positioning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

Exactly.

All the more reason why the historical aspect of the transit hobby is so intriguing!

Recall, also, the long-gone "buzz boxes" that were used at certain BMT stations, that were actuated via third rail.

When reading of the third rails/third rail shoes of the old wooden El equipment, you'll read of both "El type" and "tongue shaped" shoes.

With the BRT's 1400-series "BU" cars, "U"-shaped third rail shoes were originally used; later on, these shoes were replaced with the more-modern tongue-shaped shoes, on cars serving the Fulton St. line, and, later, the Culver.

Interesting, also, to think of the El trains, early on, also running on surface trackage (both street running and private ROW), and equipped with trolley poles, end platform steps, fare registers, and headlights.......

"NYO"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Undated (1960's/early 70's) view of a Lo-V work motor at 36th St.; note the "Tee-Yay" green New Looks in the background.......

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?24412

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back in the day, the sight of a single-unit subway car opering sans train indeed conjured up images of streetcars and interurbans (or, the one-car ME-1 trains used on the SIRT's Arlington and South Beach lines, until 1953)

Here, we see IND R-1 #137* on the move at 36th St.; note that the car is signed up for a BMT route:

"2-ASTORIA VIA TUNNEL"

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?112562

*note the "traditonal" motorman sporting a tie!

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 57
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 2406
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
Back in the day, the sight of a single-unit subway car opering sans train indeed conjured up images of streetcars and interurbans (or, the one-car ME-1 trains used on the SIRT's Arlington and South Beach lines, until 1953)

Here, we see IND R-1 #137 on the move at 36th St.; note that the car is signed up for a BMT route:

"2-ASTORIA VIA TUNNEL"

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?112562

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

Notice how the '2' on the top left front sign was shaped as on the IRT roll signs from R-17 on. No doubt made by the same company - Hunter Illuminated Sign Co. As well as their being Brooklyn-oriented ('4th Avenue').
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

Agreed!

That "2" clearly is shaped in the classic SMEE-era IRT style.....LOVE classic subway signage! Wink

"NYO"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya gotta wonder........

Today, in 2020, we have several hundred new subway cars sidelined because of safety issues.

Back in the day, however, WOODEN El cars, many of which dated back to the late 19th century, and which were originally hauled by small Forney engines, lasted in service through the mid-20th century.

I've read that some of the oldest cars, after being relegated to work service, were nearly 70 years old..........and these were WOODEN cars, mind you! Shocked

Even well into her 90's, Mom remembered girlhood jaunts with her family from Park Row to Coney Island (1920's/early 1930's), on "trains that they used to take the sides off for the summer" (these were, of course, the classic BRT/BMT covertibles!)

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?112537

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?112560

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(I'd LOVE to see any of the modern NTT trains last THIS long, even as a work car!)

You're NEVER too old to continue life as a trusted "work horse", in your "senior years"(!!) Wink

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?112579

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

36th St. yard, circa-1954.

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?6761

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

In this old photo, we see ex-SIRT ME-1's and a sea of Old Looks* dominating this timeless transit portrait.

(*one bus #4452, can have its number easily read; this would have been a TDH-4510, built in 1948)

Recall, too, that the SIRT electrified its lines in 1925 with BMT-style cars, which would have (via a new set of tubes under the Narrows) to allow the SIRT's newly electrified lines to link up with the BMT's 4th Avenue line, thus allowing Staten Island commuters a one-seat ride into Manhattan.

The NYCTA purchased a number of SIRT ME-1's after passenger service was abandoned on the South Beach and Arlington lines (after a 1962 fire at the Clifton shops, the SIRT indeed wished that they still had these cars on the roster!)

The NYCTA removed the large headlights from the cars, and installed subway-style axiflow fans inside.

The flip-over seats were bolted in place, requiring half the passengers to ride backwards.

Metal destination plates, rescued from scrapped El cars, were installed, and BMT Standard controls were installed between the center doors; the cars were also repainted

The ex-SIRT trailers were used as yard offices/work cars, and were not used in revenue service (originally, they were to be converted into revenue collection cars)

The former Staten Island cars were used on several BMT routes, including:

WEST END-NASSAU LOCAL

FRANKLIN AVENUE SHUTTLE

CULVER-NASSAU (DITMAS-CHAMBERS)

The ex-SIRT cars were not long for "Tee-Yay" service; by 1961 they were OOS, and were scrapped.......

"NYO"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

An interesting lineup at the Fresh Pond (BMT) yard, 1971.

No BMT rolling stock is to be seen in this view (the last Standards were retired two years earlier); only prewar IND cars are seen, awaiting the next call to duty.

Note that two sets are here signed for the "M" (note blank destination boxes); the (third) train on the right is bearing classic BMT signage* "10-METROPOLITAN AVENUE".......

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?1763

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

*The first BMT rolling stock to utilize end sign boxes were the "D"-type Triplex units, which entered service in 1925 (retired 1965).........
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The BMT "Multis", which entered service in 1936, represented the last production model articulated subway trains for not only the BMT, but also, New York subways in general.

These trains were also unique in that they were the first production model cars to have full-width cabs, which, of course, is the norm nowadays.

These handsome units were quite "state of the art" for that time; interestingly, in sort of a "deja vu inkling", the units were quickly withdrawn from service as the BMT deemed that modifications were needed to the trucks.

The units were returned to service in 1937, and were assigned to the Eastern Division.

The modern cars did not enjoy a long service life; the "Tee-Yay" retired them in 1961, as these were deemed "non-standard" equipment on the roster.

Sadly, none of these impressive units were saved.

Their unique chain-driven "NEXT STOP" interior signs were the ancestors of the electronic signs now commonplace in today's NTT trains.....

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?6733 *

(A nice BMT third rail shoe/end of third rail view here as well!)

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scruffy-looking R-27's and a vintage prewar IND train operating a fantrip (here signed for the BMT #10) both at Fresh Pond Road, climbing the ramp up to the station, with a number of OOS Fishbowls down below.......

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?38573

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?1972

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)


Last edited by NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 on Tue Jan 21, 2020 9:44 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here in 1971, we see a train of R-42's climbing the Fresh Pond ramp, this time rising above a group of Old Looks*........

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?5618

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

*Note lead bus was one of the "buses with the sign that sticks out in the front" (TDH-5106)

Sadly, these unique and handsome buses were not destined for long service lives........ Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22516
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

An interesting photo from 1977 at the Rockaway Parkway station "LL" (Canarsie line)

Front and center, we see a graffiti-scarred R-16, patiently awaiting the next call to duty.

Note the New looks in the background; while the bus on the left is sporting the "new" MTA blue, the bus on the right (which appears to have a three-piece rear window) is still wearing its original "Tee-Yay" green........

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?3014

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 57
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 2406
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
An interesting photo from 1977 at the Rockaway Parkway station "LL" (Canarsie line)

Front and center, we see a graffiti-scarred R-16, patiently awaiting the next call to duty.

Note the New looks in the background; while the bus on the left is sporting the "new" MTA blue, the bus on the right (which appears to have a three-piece rear window) is still wearing its original "Tee-Yay" green........

http://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?3014

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

I checked that 'Tee-Yay' green bus, and its rear window appears four-piece. Must've been a retro-conversion, given that the 1963 order was the only one to GM for the TA up to the 1966-67 A/C batwing order.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 5 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group