BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

"Happy Birthday, IRT!":Influences:Philly/Chicago
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 86, 87, 88 ... 96, 97, 98  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(SEE PREVIOUS POST)

"Foither"......

The "17s" I recall on the shuttle (early/mid-1980s) were white-painted(!!), but featured stylish blue interiors which easily recalled an earlier era.......... Wink

["ST. LOUIS CAR COMPANY"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hard to believe all this time has gone by.........

On this day in 1969, the very last prewar "Eye-Are-Tee" cars made their final runs on the "Toid-Aven-uh" El, up in "da Bronx" (they were replaced by "R-12s")

And, on this day in 2003, the last train of the iconic "Redboids" (ex-WF "Blueboids") were retired on the #7 Flushing line.

How ironic that these last runs took place on the SAME day, 34 years apart......

"NYO"

["5698"]

["FOLLOW THE BLUE ARROW"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fittingly...........

Your's Truly retired the year following the retirement of the last "Redboids"; until the day I retired, I then totally ignored the "Eye-Are-Tee", and used it only when need be.

By this time, I had switched my "alliance" over to the "Brightliners" then running on the "C"; to be totally honest, it felt WEIRD as all heck being in the subway, and knowing NOT ONE "Redboid" was running, anywhere in the system...... Sad

"NYO"

["BUDD"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Subway route letter designations ("quirks)..........

Always wondered why there was never an "MM" desination", nor an "NN".

Too, why "I" was never used, even though you have a "J" (and, long ago, there WAS a "JJ")

Also, wonder why an "O","P", "U", "X", or "Y" designation was never used (or ever considered)

Indeed, I am far, far removed from being an expert on this topic, but HAVE been curious for quite some time.....as always, appreciate input..........

"NYO"

["CC HUDSON TERMINAL"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
W.B. Fishbowl



Age: 59
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 4507
Location: New York, New York, USA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote:
Subway route letter designations ("quirks)..........

Always wondered why there was never an "MM" desination", nor an "NN".

Too, why "I" was never used, even though you have a "J" (and, long ago, there WAS a "JJ")

Also, wonder why an "O","P", "U", "X", or "Y" designation was never used (or ever considered)

Indeed, I am far, far removed from being an expert on this topic, but HAVE been curious for quite some time.....as always, appreciate input..........

"NYO"

["CC HUDSON TERMINAL"]

There were plans, in 1968-69, for an 'MM'; basically, with a few modifications and variances, it is today's 'M' line. The 'MM' would have been colored green, and run alongside the B, D and F on Sixth on middays in-between 'KK' runs. Of course, it never got off the ground.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

W.B.:

Appreciate the info; OK, so there WAS a "MM" designation, that never saw the light of day.

Recalling now, how, in later years, the old "HH" designation was revived for Rockaway trains, after being disused since 1946, when the old Court Street shuttle was abandoned........

"NYO"

["HH"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2024 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just thinking.....

The "Eye-En-Dee's" original route letter designations began (natch) with "A" and ran through "HH" (Court Street shuttle)

It would have been interesting, had the "Second System" lines been built, what letter designations the new routes might have been given............

"NYO"

["INDEPENDENT SUBWAY SYSTEM"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2024 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A thought..........

Thankfully (for obvious reasons!) that the "Eye-Are-Tee" was totally exempt from the Christie Street Connection of 1967; one can only imagine how TOTALLY fouled up the old "INTERBOROUGH" would have ended up. Razz

Thinking now of "Eye-Are-Tee" route numbers (which were initiated with the delivery of the "R-12s" in 1948) and how the highest route number designation was the now-defunct "9"......

"NYO"

["I.R.T. LINES"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Nov 23, 2024 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's the "Eye-Are-Tee" (literally!) in sunny California! (VERY detailed and interesting page, detailing the ex-2nd Avenue El cars that "went to war")

Several rare photos on this page as well......... Wink

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shipyard_Railway

["INTERBOROUGH"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are two of the ex-2nd Avenue El cars that went to California to serve the Key System's wartime Shipyard Railway......

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?16164

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

Interesting that the El cars that went to California, as well as those which were refurbished for the Dyre Avenue shuttle were surplus from the 2nd Avenue El.

Note that the California cars were refitted with pantographs; it gives us an idea of what the Dyre Avenue shuttle cars might have looked like, had the City decided to use the ex-NYW&B's catenary instead of installing "toid" rail.........

"NYO"

["DYRE AVENUE-E. 180TH ST."]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1271
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYO,

The pantographs didn't look bad on them. Just think, if wartime traffic had kept up on the Key System, maybe these cars would have seen additional use if new cars weren't immediately available or affordable. But, I suppose the "riding public" wants the "latest" equipment and this might not have been what they had in mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider wrote:
NYO,

The pantographs didn't look bad on them. Just think, if wartime traffic had kept up on the Key System, maybe these cars would have seen additional use if new cars weren't immediately available or affordable. But, I suppose the "riding public" wants the "latest" equipment and this might not have been what they had in mind.


Cyberider:

To this day, there are rail historians who still wonder why the more modern cars from the NWP and IER were not offered to the "KEY" for the wartime Shipyard Railway.

Certainly, not only those cars were a bit less elderly, but also, they were not of wood construction.........

"NYO"

["EASTSHORE EMPIRE"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider:

Here's an early 1940s photo of the then-new (IRT) Dyre Avenue shuttle, using the Bronx section of the old NYB&B, defunct since late 1937........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?42095

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

Note the ex-"WESTCHESTER" catenary still intact; at that time, there was still hope for the revival of at least some "WESTCHESTER" express service, but, alas, this never came to pass.

It IS easy, however, to picture these cars equipped with pantographs, and operating off of catenary..........

"NYO"

["INTERBOROUGH"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1271
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NYO:

The only thing I can think of is that maybe the NWP and IER cars were too long to negotiate the curves of the proposed route.

As for the Dyre Ave. shuttle using the existing overhead, what voltage did the NYB&B run? The number of insulators in the photo look like it may be for more than 600 volts. How long was this operated as a shuttle with the Second Ave. El cars? They certainly look hansom in the photo!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 30856
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider wrote:
NYO:

The only thing I can think of is that maybe the NWP and IER cars were too long to negotiate the curves of the proposed route.

As for the Dyre Ave. shuttle using the existing overhead, what voltage did the NYW&B run? The number of insulators in the photo look like it may be for more than 600 volts. How long was this operated as a shuttle with the Second Ave. El cars? They certainly look hansom in the photo!


Cyberider:

The Dyre Avenue shuttle operated with wooden El cars from the early 1940s through the early 1950s, when they were replaced by elderly (steel) "Hi-V' (High Voltage) subway cars.

In 1957, the shuttle (via a new track connection) was tied into the IRT "mainlines", enabling through service to Manhattan and Brooklyn.

The NYW&B's catenary carried a whopping 11,000 volts, which was stepped down to 250 volts at the car motors.The power generated came from the parent New Haven's Cos Cob generating plant.

Hope this info helps! Wink

"NYO"

['WHITE PLAINS EXPRESS"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> New York City Buses All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 86, 87, 88 ... 96, 97, 98  Next
Page 87 of 98

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group