 |
BusTalk A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 30756 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hard to believe that it is now 36 years since the venerable "MP-52"/"K" PRR/H&M/PATH cars were retired.
Youir's Truly literally grew up with these iconic cars, beginning with thier running on the old PRR/H&M?PATH "joint service" to Newark, back in the 60s as a lad.
Then, all the years of railfanning them, and commuting on them, beginning in 1979; what great memories!
These were the last cars in the PATH fleet to have single-panel doors and incandescent lighting.
Sadly, from what I understand, not one of these historic cars was preserved.
How very fortunate I am to have so many wonderful memories.......
"NYO"
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?75666
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?24760
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?38104
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?71108
(courtesy: nycsubway.org) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 59 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 4485 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | Hard to believe that it is now 36 years since the venerable "MP-52"/"K" PRR/H&M/PATH cars were retired.
Youir's Truly literally grew up with these iconic cars, beginning with thier running on the old PRR/H&M?PATH "joint service" to Newark, back in the 60s as a lad.
Then, all the years of railfanning them, and commuting on them, beginning in 1979; what great memories!
These were the last cars in the PATH fleet to have single-panel doors and incandescent lighting.
Sadly, from what I understand, not one of these historic cars was preserved.
How very fortunate I am to have so many wonderful memories.......
"NYO"
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?75666
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?24760
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?38104
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?71108
(courtesy: nycsubway.org) |
Their end doors looked almost exactly like those of "Eye-Are-Tee" "SMEE" cars from the R-26 thru to the R-36 WF and ML classes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 30756 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
Agreed.
Note, also, the narrow "gun slot" end sign boxes, reminiscent of both "Bah-ston's" and "Shik-aga's" postwar rolling stock..........TOTALLY unlike "Noo Yawk'!
"NYO"
["NEWARK"] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 30756 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This interior photo of a "K" from 1976 shows us that, unlike "Noo Yawk's" rolling stock, upholstered seating was still in use, and would be until the cars were retired in 1989............
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?40079
(courtesy: nycsunbay.org)
["World Trade Center"] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 30756 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Compare these cab views (scruffy-looking "K" cab, post-retirement, and a restored "R-17")*.......
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?157645
https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?3213
(courtesy: nycsubway.org)
*(remember that the "17s" were only in "soivice" for a few years, when the "foist" of the "MP-52"/"Ks" debuted in 1958;as we know, both types were built by St. Louis)
["PATH"]
["NYCTA"] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyberider

Joined: 27 Apr 2007 Posts: 1262 Location: Tempe, AZ
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nice practical looking cars, especially the one with the PRR keystone on the end door. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 59 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 4485 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yep. Back when H&M was a railroad, and not a clothing chain . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 30756 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cyberider wrote: | | Nice practical looking cars, especially the one with the PRR keystone on the end door. |
Cyberider:
What I have always found interesting is that, despite it being 1958, the PRR/H&M chose to utilize incandescent lighting in these a/c cars; recall, the IND "R-10's"and the IRT "R-12s" were delivered in 1948 (ten years earlier) but were equipped with florescent lighting.
Also, the last new single-panel door rolling stock on the subways were the IRT's 1938 "WF" cars..........
"NYO"
["H&M"]
["IRT LINES"] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 59 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 4485 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | | Cyberider wrote: | | Nice practical looking cars, especially the one with the PRR keystone on the end door. |
Cyberider:
What I have always found interesting is that, despite it being 1958, the PRR/H&M chose to utilize incandescent lighting in these a/c cars; recall, the IND "R-10's"and the IRT "R-12s" were delivered in 1948 (ten years earlier) but were equipped with florescent lighting.
Also, the last new single-panel door rolling stock on the subways were the IRT's 1938 "WF" cars..........
"NYO"
["H&M"]
["IRT LINES"] |
Even more behind than H&M in regards to lighting on rapid transit cars was Boston's then-MTA, with the "Cambridge" cars of 1963 (later the Red Line). I've been on them too, in 1988. "Incandescent City" they were. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 30756 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
W.B,:
I've read that those 1963 "Cambridge" cars WERE, indeed, intended to have florescent lighting, but, ended up with incandescent instead, as a cost-saving measure...........
"NYO"
["MTA"] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 59 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 4485 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2025 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | W.B,:
I've read that those 1963 "Cambridge" cars WERE, indeed, intended to have florescent lighting, but, ended up with incandescent instead, as a cost-saving measure...........
"NYO"
["MTA"] |
I wonder if that was also the case with the K/MP-52's as well, especially on the H&M's end (as they were in bankruptcy at the time). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 30756 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.
Could very well be; the old "Aitch & Em" was in dire financial straits at that time, and the once-mighty PRR was indeed having MORE than its share of money issues, at that time.
Small wonder, then, that the PRR pulled out of the "joint service" to Newark, severing a liason with "The Tubes" that had existed since at least 1911 (after the "joint service" ended in 1967, the Penn-Central leased the cars owned by the PRR to PATH for $1 a year).........
"NYO"
["NEWARK"] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 59 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 4485 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Even the "Port-of-Authority's" website, when deigning to acknowledge the "Aitch & Em's" history, has to put this qualifier:
" . . . the Hudson and Manhattan Railroad (H&M), which has nothing to do with the H&M retail clothing store for men, women, teenagers and children."
This, B.T.W., was in reference to a 1906 consolidation with the New Jersey Railroad Company, which originally built the vast network that constitutes the earliest sections of today's PATH system. Evidence:
https://portfolio.panynj.gov/2016/06/03/before-path-became-path-the-wonder-years/
Alas, their timeline ends in 1911. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 30756 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
Thanks for posting this link!
Ahhh, the many, many memories these old photos bring back for Your's Truly! (top photo was taken at the main concourse at Hudson Terminal)
Mom and I could EASILY have been aboard one of the two "Black" trains at "Joinal" Square, over 60 years ago!
I still recall well the photos of the new "Pee-Yay" cars when they debuted in 1965, carried in our local papers, both of which, like the "Black" cars ans the original "Pee-Yay" cars,. are no longer with us.
I also remember the large "HUDSON RAPID TUBES" sign over the main entrance at "Joinal" Square, with the word "RAPID" slanted towards the right, to denote "rapid"............man, it's all so long ago, now........
"NYO"
["JOURNAL SQUARE-33RD STREET"] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 30756 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2025 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Beyond insanity.......
Just "hoid" on 1010 WINS that, by 2028, the "Pee-Yay" wants to hike PATH ("da tubes") fares to FOUR DOLLARS!!!!!!
Man, if I were still working downtown, I'be be working just to cover mt COMMUTATION costs!!!!!
And, to think, the fare was THIRTY CENTS in 1979, whem I started "woikin'" down on "da Street".
Like the "Pee-Yay" so cash-starved and financially ailing...........
"NYO"
["JSQ"] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|