BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Electrico Carro Fiesta!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 48, 49, 50  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Surface Transit - Everywhere Else
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forgot to mention earlier........

In addition to the 125th Street Ferry, TARS streetcars (until 1933) also connected with the excursion boats of the "IRON STEAMBOAT COMPANY" (these boats ran to Coney Island)

And, until 1964, "SURFACE"/"MaBSTOA" buses connected with the boats of the "HUDSON RIVER DAY LINE", which docked at an adjacent pier at 125th Street...........

"NYO"

["ENTRANCE TO BOATS"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2025 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting.........

When the Subway Terminal and the Hollywood Subway closed in 1955, the PCCs were not scrapped but stored in the subway tunnel for several years, where the elements were NOT at all kind to them, before they were finally shipped to South America for further service.

I could have seen these cars going to Newark, for operating on the City Subway, and/or the Mattapan line in Boston.

Of course, by 1955, the City Subway had already been infused with the 30 ex-TCRT PCCs.............

"NYO"

['GLENDALE"}
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2025 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is also interesting that PE purchased "non-standard" PCCs; I can picture PE purchasing (either from ST. LOUIS or PULLMAN) PCCs that, while being double-ended, utilized the same "basic" styling used by hundreds of other cars for other systems, built prior to WW2..........

"NYO"

["HOLLYWOOD VIA SUBWAY"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1155
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought they were standard pre-WWII appearance other than being double-ended?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider wrote:
I thought they were standard pre-WWII appearance other than being double-ended?


Cyberider:

Basically they WERE "standard", BUT, not only were they double-ended (QUITE unorthodox for a PCC at that time) but also, the wheel skirtings; thiese gave the cars a very "low slung" appearance..........

"NYO"

*(imagine if PE had later purchased POSTWAR douyble-ended PCCs!)Shocked

['SUBWAY TERMINAL"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PE's Long Beach line........

Had PE's Long Beach line (Metropolitan Coach Lines/MTA) been retained and not abandoned in 1961, it would have been interesting to see how this would have affected the rolling stock used.

Would the "Blimps" have been modernized/updated (thinking now of the RDG's "Blueliner" MUs)

Would new cars been built, possibly along the lines of the new generation of MUs then running on the LIRR and NYC, back East? (early 1960s)

Or, possibly renovating PCCs, to operate in MU trains.

It's always interesting to "speculate" on what might have been..........

"NYO"

["LONG BEACH"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1155
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2025 7:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's unlikely that the Blimps would have undergone another "modernization" since most of them were then 50 years old. Also, the Torrance Shops had been shut down in 1955 so there was no significant repair facility after that. in 1960, LAMTA borrowed some standard gauge PCC trucks from MUNI and installed them on an MCL PCC and made a few trips up and down the Long Beach line but nothing further was heard of that. PE/SP wasn't keen on having continued passenger service on their tracks. And, finally, freeway building was still in full swing and that was considered to be the way of the future. And that was that until LAMTA/SCRTD could get the taxpayers to cough up enough money to build an abbreviated new rail system, mostly over the same routes that had been used previously. LA didn't have enough downtown bound traffic like NYC had to justify the suburban rail systems that the greater NYC area had. So, now they have LRV's doing what interurbans once did and a short subway system that seems to stop short of any real destination.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2025 10:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider:

Good comments; thanks for sharing here.

So many.....TOO many factors......contributed to the ultimate and total downfall of the once-vast "Red Car" empire.

That the Long Beach line became the sole surviving active remnant of the PE, I find ironic, as that, today, 'Blue Line" LRV units now speed along the rails in territory that once belonged to the PE's Long Beach line.

Anti-rail local politics, along with the powerful, forceful trend to bus conversions, and freeway construction was simply too powerful a foe for the "Red Csr" to fend off.

How ironic, that today, long after the last vestiges of the far-flung "Red Car" disappeared, LA now has both light and heavy rail electric rail transit..........

"NYO

["LONG BEACH"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2025 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

See also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_Metro_Rail

["M"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2025 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Electric Rail Mentality" ("ERM") in Los Angeles.........

Truly makes you think that, by the 1950s/early 1960s, electric rail transit in and around Los Angeles was deemed outmoded and old-fashioned, not at all "in sync" with the ever-growing car/freeway culture, and the steady conversions to buses.

BUT, lo and behold, a few decades later, electric rail transit is suddenly now the "in thing" in Los Angeles, now boasting both light and heavy electric rail.

When you think of how what was once the WORLD'S LARGEST ELECTRIC RAILWAY SYSTEM IN THE WORLD was, bit by bit, dissected until NOTHING remained, it truly becomes a glaring, shameful example of TOTAL LACK of forward-thinking, thinking of a time when the freeways would be totally choked with traffic, with NO alternate means of getting from "A" to "B".

Now, think of what electric rail transit in LA would be like today, HAD what was the PE's far-flung electric network NOT been so foolishly and wantonly destroyed...........

"NYO"

["BEVERLY HILLS"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1155
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2025 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a hard time imagining what something might have been when I've been so well versed on what was for most of my life. The PE was an amazing system and what they've built now can't compare in any way whatsoever. At this stage, I'll continue to live in my dream world of what was.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2025 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyberider wrote:
I have a hard time imagining what something might have been when I've been so well versed on what was for most of my life. The PE was an amazing system and what they've built now can't compare in any way whatsoever. At this stage, I'll continue to live in my dream world of what was.


Cyberider:

You and me BOTH, my friend!

TOTALLY impossible to make a connection between what passes for an "electric rail network" in LA today, with the massive, extensive, and diverse PE system of 80-odd years ago.

The "Red Car" was indeed the undisputed KING of the world's electric rail network, and today, only those fortunate preserved cars in museum collections, as well the less-then-a-handful former PE structures that still survive today, remain to remind us of the greatness that once was.....and which will never be again.......... Sad

"NYO"

["SIC TRANSIT GLORIA"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2025 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Recalling, PE's unique double-ended PCCs, check out this MAGNIFICENT restored double-ended MUNI* PCC (also, check out the historic photos, one of which includes a WHITE 798!!) Wink

https://www.streetcar.org/streetcars/1006-1006-muni-wings/

*Note that MUNI later converted 15 of the double-enders into single-ended cars; Boston's "T" did the same with the ex-Dallas cars the MTA had purchases years earlier..........

["1006"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 29942
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2025 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scroll down through page for a VERY diverse collection of traction photos, representing fleets from across the country! Very Happy

https://thetrolleydodger.com/tag/sf-magic-carpet-cars/

["ST. LOUIS CAR COMPANY"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyberider




Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 1155
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2025 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Dallas cars, delivered in 1945. had the prewar styling similar to PE's. Sounds like MUNI and Boston didn't purchase the Dallas cars for their double-ended feature.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Surface Transit - Everywhere Else All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 48, 49, 50  Next
Page 49 of 50

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group