|
BusTalk A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
(SEE PREVIOUS POSTS)
The late 1960s................
Not at all surprising that the "Tee-Yay" "Pattons" were retired several years before the last "Kramdens"; it was the same here in "Joisey".,.....by the late 1960s, the non-"Gee-Em" buses were the "foist" to go, as new Fishbowls arrived......
'NYO"
["SURE-IT'S A MACK!"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2024 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here in "Joisey"..............
When the "foist" influx of Fishbowls began to appear in my area about late 1966/1967, the "foist" of the "Gee-Em" buses to be retired were the "square windows" (this purge also included the late-model YELLOWS then still running)
Meanwhile, the "Pattons", WHITES, ACF-BRILLS, and assorted other antiques that had lasted so long and served so well (this included some prewar buses still in use) disappeared rapidly.
If memory serves Your's Truly correctly, the last "Pattons" disappeared in 1967/1968; after that, it was all 'Gee-Em" buses (the remaining "Shermans" and the Fishbowls) before the NJDOT "Dangerfields" began arriving in large numbers, later in the 70s.
Yes, I was there to witness the "changing of the guard"..........
"NYO"
["1 JOURNAL SQUARE"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I might have inquired about this long ago elsewhere.........
Did the "Tee-Yay" have a "rollsign shop" at each garage/depot, or only at the larger ones?
I've always been curious as to the "upkeep" of the curtains and their respective signboxes (and also, when and where "splicing" took places, when routes were changed/re-numbered)
As always, appreciate info......
"NYO"
["New York City Transit Authority"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also, repairs, etc to "batwings".............
"NYO:
["BUS-O-RAMA"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3528 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2024 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | I might have inquired about this long ago elsewhere.........
Did the "Tee-Yay" have a "rollsign shop" at each garage/depot, or only at the larger ones?
I've always been curious as to the "upkeep" of the curtains and their respective signboxes (and also, when and where "splicing" took places, when routes were changed/re-numbered)
As always, appreciate info......
"NYO"
["New York City Transit Authority"] |
If the "Tee-Yay" had their own roll sign shop, in terms of actually making them on the old "cloth" types, it would likely have been at "Boigen" Street out in Brooklyn. The '50 FREEDOMLAND' in that 1970 photo may have been from an in-house-made roll sign. "Soitanly," the Staten Island bus roll signs as on many pics of "Pattons," "Shermans / Kramdens" and Fishbowls may've been homemade. Their fonts were definitely different from those of Hunter Illuminated Sign / Trans-Lite and Transign, for sure.
But no doubt each depot had kept track of their inventories. How do you explain, for example, 1963 " 'stoa" front roll signs from Transign re-used on later make "Bullets" (the 1965-66 and 1967 fleets), as buses kept getting passed from one depot to another? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2024 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
GREAT info; just what I wished to know!
"Boigen" Street; wasn't that where the B&QT trolleybuses were based?
I CRINGE when I think of the thousands of roller curtains that were either simply trashed when such signage fell out of favor, or simply left inside the buses when they were scrapped.
Man, I wish I had even ONE batwing rear-door curtain.........again, think of the many hundreds simply tossed in the dumpster, with no regard to history.......
"NYO"
["NYCTA"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3528 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | W.B.:
GREAT info; just what I wished to know!
"Boigen" Street; wasn't that where the B&QT trolleybuses were based?
I CRINGE when I think of the thousands of roller curtains that were either simply trashed when such signage fell out of favor, or simply left inside the buses when they were scrapped.
Man, I wish I had even ONE batwing rear-door curtain.........again, think of the many hundreds simply tossed in the dumpster, with no regard to history.......
"NYO"
["NYCTA"] |
I think that old car barn, after the last trolleybuses were retired, was what became the "Tee-Yay's" main sign shop. I read about how the way they painted signs for the subways after the 1967 color scheme took effect, gave Vignelli and his fellow designers heartburn. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
Thanks for this additional info.
I still shudder to think of the hundreds of "Soiface" and FACCo/FACL/NYO roller curtains that were simply tossed in the dumpsters, thought of nothing but redundant old trash.
NO WONDER that even SEGMENTS of roller curtains command such astronomical prices today...........
"NYO"
["RIDE THE SURFACE WAY"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2024 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
This one's for you............
When did the "Em-Tee-Yay" abandon any and all "official" usage of references to "MaBSTOA"?
Also, what were the last "stoa" routes" to use the GRUMMAN (aka "Borough Bombers") and the "Are-Tee-Es"? (also, when were these buses last used on "stoa" routes?
As always, appreciate info.............
"NYO"
["MaBSTOA"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3528 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2024 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | W.B.:
This one's for you............
When did the "Em-Tee-Yay" abandon any and all "official" usage of references to "MaBSTOA"?
Also, what were the last "stoa" routes" to use the GRUMMAN (aka "Borough Bombers") and the "Are-Tee-Es"? (also, when were these buses last used on "stoa" routes?
As always, appreciate info.............
"NYO"
["MaBSTOA"] |
Viz the first question, I'd say what last vestiges were removed once the 'M' logo was retired and the angled 'MTA' in a circle debuted in '93, but even before that I noticed in the later part of the '80's buses originally designated "MaBSTOA" had them changed to "NYCTA."
The M42 and the M20 were definitely among the last in Manhattan to run the gallant "Torpedos." They were as " 'stoa" as you could get. You could almost say the "Are-Tee-Ess'," in their "soivice" to such routes, were almost "Mab-stoic."
As for the Grumman "Borough Bombers," their last assignments to " 'stoa" routes would have been out of 54th Street, Amsterdam and Coliseum depots. This would include, for the first-named, the M6, M28 and M32; the second, M100 and M104; and the last, a bunch of Bx routes. A WABC-TV "Eyewitness News" report on the day the "Bombers" were pulled for the last time showed one such bus running on the M6. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2024 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
Appreciate, as always, your always in-depth info!
Indeed, those "Are-Tee-Es" were "Mab-stoic"; though Your's Truly never rode on in Manhattan, I certainly was no stranger to them here in "Joisey" *when we FINALLY got them!), especially the ex-"Em-Tee-Yay" buses that ACADEMY purchased....my FAVES, all the way!
Funny you mentioned that old "Eyewitness News" report; I had not thought of it in years, but recalled it quickly when you brought up mention (dang, where have the years gone?)
I now wonder how many of the rebuilt GRUMMANS (the ex-"EM-Tee-Yay" units) I might have ridden on, many, many years back, when riding the old "indy" routes in Hudson County?
I'd STILL take one today, over an insipid NABI or a slithering "Wurlitzer Wannabe"..............(!!)
"NYO"
["GRUMMAN"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just curious.........
Were the "Torpedoes" running on "stoa" routes longer than either the Fishbowl or the "Dangerfield"?
Which of the three had the longest "soivice" time, running for "stoa"?
"NYO"
["Rapid Transit Series"]
["GM"]
["FLXIBLE"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3528 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | Just curious.........
Were the "Torpedoes" running on "stoa" routes longer than either the Fishbowl or the "Dangerfield"?
Which of the three had the longest "soivice" time, running for "stoa"?
"NYO"
["Rapid Transit Series"]
["GM"]
["FLXIBLE"] |
The "Torpedoes," for sure, had 'em all beat: nearly 38 years, from the time the first "Are-Tee-Ess' " entered "soivice" in August of 1981.
The Fishbowls, if one only counted those ordered a year into " 'stoa's" existence in 1963: 32 years. If counting the FACL/ST "Jetsons" ordered two years before " 'stoa's" creation: 33 years.
The "Dangerfields"? 23 years (1970-1993). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 26324 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
Thanks for the info.
Sad that the "no respect" Flex New Looks (aka "Dangerfields") had the shortest tour of duty with "stoa" than their counterparts.
BUT, then again, how about those unique 5106 "Kramdens", which were pulled from "soivice" after only about 11 or so years on the road?
Dang, those buses were just about well broken in, when they were put out to pasture..........
"NYO"
["OA"] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3528 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2024 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | W.B.:
Thanks for the info.
Sad that the "no respect" Flex New Looks (aka "Dangerfields") had the shortest tour of duty with "stoa" than their counterparts.
BUT, then again, how about those unique 5106 "Kramdens", which were pulled from "soivice" after only about 11 or so years on the road?
Dang, those buses were just about well broken in, when they were put out to pasture..........
"NYO"
["OA"] |
If this is of consolation, "Dangerfields' " "soivice" to the "Tee-Yay" was more on the order of 29 years (1964-1993), so on that they had a leg up on " 'stoa." Because the "Shermans / Kramdens' " "soivice" began in the days of FACCo, NYCO and "Soiface" (32 years in general), in " 'stoa's" case, from its inception to the last of those unique 5106's, only the last eight of those years were applicable to their existence. (And those 5106's run was 11-12 years total, among the shortest of that breed.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|