|
BusTalk A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DE60LF
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 142 Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:42 pm Post subject: New Flyer vs Gillig BRT buses |
|
|
I have wondered why New Flyer's BRT buses have not been huge sellers. The Gillig Advantage BRT, for comparison, is currently Gillig's biggest cash cow, and makes up a majority of Gillig Advantages sold today. The Gillig Advantage BRT in fact has been proven popular for non-BRT use, as Denver RTD and Lynx (Orlando) have ordered them to use on regular routes. While a few DE60LF BRTs have been sold, the DE40LF BRT has yet to get an order. Only Gillig offers BRT buses in 30-foot and 35-foot lengths.
BTW, the DE40LF BRT is NOT the same as the DE40LFR (restyled front end).
New Flyer DE40LF BRT:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/New_Flyer_Advanced_Styling_BRT.jpg
New Flyer DE40LFR (with frameless windows):
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/Cathybrid.jpg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Port of Authority
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 118 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Gillig BRT doesn't really compete with the New Flyer BRT; it competes with the New Flyer x40LFR series.
I don't know of any agencies that have ordered 40-foot New Flyer BRT buses. Eugene, OR and Cleveland, OH have ordered New Flyer BRT artics, however (and it helps that Gillig doesn't offer an articulated competitor, either.)
Besides, what's the big advantage of ordering a New Flyer BRT bus? It's just a x40LF with a newer, more expensive end grafted on. The x40LFR series is probably much cheaper than their BRT equivalents. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RTS_04
Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Port of Authority wrote: |
Besides, what's the big advantage of ordering a New Flyer BRT bus? It's just a x40LF with a newer, more expensive end grafted on. The x40LFR series is probably much cheaper than their BRT equivalents. |
Styling for one, but you're right.
I think the same thing can be argued for the Gillig BRT - there's nothing BRT about it; it's just an Advantage that looks good, in my mind.
I had a chance to ride on a new Gillig BRT at TANK in Kentucky, but ultimately passed in favor of hitching a ride on an AM General. Those who did ride the BRT tell me it rides the same as a normal Gillig LF (which is still nicer than the AM General's ride, FWIW...). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DE60LF
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 142 Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also, doesn't New Flyer still offer the old-style front? ABQ RIDE's 6600-series DE60LFs delivered earlier this year still have the old-style front. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ripta42 Site Admin
Age: 45 Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 1035 Location: Pawtucket, RI / Woburn, MA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
CTA is still receiving New Flyers with the "classic" front.
A few years ago, transportation planning industry slang for these "BRT-styled" buses was WCV, for "Way Cool Vehicle." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DE60LF
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 142 Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just as a question: Has New Flyer even produced a 30-foot or 35-foot bus with the restyled front end yet? I know the BRT style is only available on the DE40LF and DE60LF. However, I have never even seen the restyled front end on a 30-foot or 35-foot New Flyer low floor.
The D40LFR and DE40LFR were introduced in 2005. The C40LFR and E40LFR were introduced last year. The first New Flyer articulated buses with the restyled front end (D60LFR, DE60LFR, and E60LFR) were introduced this year with Hamilton Street Railway. Is it even an option on the 30-foot or 35-foot buses? Also, I have not seen or heard of any L40LFRs (LNG) or GE40LFRs (gasoline-electric). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RailBus63 Moderator
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 1063
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
RTS_04 wrote: | I think the same thing can be argued for the Gillig BRT - there's nothing BRT about it; it's just an Advantage that looks good, in my mind. |
I prefer the looks of the standard Gillig Advantage myself. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Q65A
Age: 66 Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 1773 Location: Central NJ
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I was in Colorado Springs last year, I saw several Gillig Advantage BRT's in service. At first, I thought they might have been either NF Inveros or NABI Compobuses, but closer inspection revealed that they were Gilligs. They were real "head turners", with intense purple, copper, or teal paint jobs: big-time stylin'!!! Kudos to the good guys from Hayward CA! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|